The content seems unobjectionable, but I can see how the name could be read as offensive, though I certainly did not read it as endorsing so much as ridiculing patriarchy. Password. You wish to draw me into an endless time-sink of rambling, endlessly shifting parsing of words, and that is a game I explicitly do not play. Your assertion that trans* plaintiffs shouldn’t get a hearing when they file claims you think are baseless is a different standard than cis people face under the law. I couldn’t run either because I hadn’t been a member for 6 months. How smarmily flippant. […] The ACA says they don’t allow transphobia if reported. the legitimate interests of women — including not touching male genitalia they don’t wish to touch — simply don’t matter; that cis women must be sacrificed on the altar of transgender rights. When summoned, rather than remove it, Tanjil Wright arrived and said, “please explain what you mean by [redacted]”. You don’t have to list every single one of the murders, destroyed families, or careers ended. Tweet: Holy Koolaid (Jul 9). So, yeah. I will never be able to watch Matt up there anymore talking anymore, his credibility is shot. Mind you, I’ve got plenty of criticisms of various laws and institutions and if you want to heap scorn on the legal system that is also fair game. Join Facebook to connect with Matt Dillahunty and others you may know. […] That would still constitute an affront to dignity even if the denial of service, in that particular context, did not.
So let’s take up a different hypothetical. I politely ask you to please stop lying about me. He may defend it as “irony”, but he shows his true face in the comments. It’s like burning leaves on my mansion’s front lawn without any concern for safety, inadvertently (but very predictably) setting my neighbor’s tiny house on fire, and then attacking and criticizing my neighbor when they come to me to complain their family nearly died in the fire. The courts accepted the filing when it was made and the filing fee paid. Perhaps twitter avatars with ‘just joking’ pepe the frog, milk glass or 1488 avatars maybe? Matt Dillahunty is an actor, known for Cthulhu's Witnesses (2013), Mission Control Texas (2015) and My Week in Atheism (2014). Theism- belief in a deity Atheism- the lack of that belief. But we’ve seen the damage that apartheid does to a society, and when you are granted incorporation of your business you get a whole slew of benefits. , [Thanks, Sky Captain, for detailing events in the relevant threads for the social-media-to-127.0.0.1ers among us.]. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. https://glinner.co.uk/the-war-on-women-yaniv-special/. Video: EoT – Matt Dillahunty’s Dishonest Defense Of RR’s Transphobia (Jul 27) (49:57): Moderation He created two accounts on the Atheism+ forum: One was "Matt Dillahunty", and the other was a "sockpuppet" account called "Curious". They have no reason to lie.
Hell, look up the thread on pizza toppings- not much alignment there. If Jonathan Haidt read this page he would probably comment that it’s natural that the AXP blog is being expelled from FtB. FTB is free to remove anyone they like, though it’s a shame that this was done without any communication with the current ACA directors. This isn’t an uncommon reaction from a certain kind of transphobe, because they think the entire reason that trans women “pretend” to be trans is because they want to invade women’s spaces and view the entire thing as an extension of misogyny and “male” entitlement. ~ EoT released everything back through April to preempt deceptive editing. Ethics requires me to to be explicit about this because I don’t want an advantage I don’t need, people should know that there isn’t that sort of neurodiversity issue here, and we will have to get more complex about this stuff eventually. We conclude that defendant has no duty under [Michigan’s pricing and advertising act] the PAA or the common law to disclose the dangers inherent in the consumption of beer. How can they expect to be taken seriously? But then in response to me, you elaborate. What you don’t do is start yelling at them about how they belong to a population you hate. You write as if you honestly believe your false statement right up until the moment when the obvious falsehood begins hurting your argument instead of helping it. See my last comment.
If I’m doing something wrong you’ve got an opportunity to fix it but you need to do more than you are now. Just keep changing the subject to flog us some more. Is there anything that can be done to repair the ACA/ I guess its up to them but here needs to be some way to support the many good folks in that community. ~ (1:43:19, Janet Reyes): Matt caused this. I’ll label you as I wish to label you. I will watch the program today, just to see if Dillahunty continues his ‘ nothing to see here’ shtick. “ANNOUNCEMENT FROM THE PRESIDENT. It is to drive you off, and score points with the in-group. #380,385: RR’s “Unfair Advantage” video, and shocking citation yet he continues to fool atheists that he was once a Christian. American activist who is best recognized for his work as president of the Atheist Community of Austin. Islam is probably the single most misogynistic institution on earth, but you better not say that here. But I’d be willing to listen to some argument on that. The law has ways of handling baseless claims, including through counter-claims. But I stand against transphobia, and therefore, I have to support FreeThoughtBlogs. [34], One of Dillahunty's recurring themes has been the superiority of secular morality over religious morality. Someone seems to think to be a beautician is analogous to being a doctor and that because a doctor has to treat all comers then so must a beautician, even though she hangs out a shingle offering her services to women only, not men. ~ It was not announced publicly, except for a mention after the fact on NonSequitur. There’s no excuse for it. Again, like i’ve already said, cherry picking news stories isn’t going to convince me against trans rights. Because those are different things and can done for good and bad reasons as well as being present together and separately. So a thread about a blog being removed turns into a battle about one case in BC that makes trans women look bad.
Best you can expect is a hypothetical response, I suspect, but we’ll see. thirdmill/301 has also made a bit of a slip there. #114: “what if it was a 32 year-old woman?”. He endorses the idea of “reciprocal abuse” — like, it’s not even a thing, it’s a more sophisticated version of the child’s “She hit me back, she’s just as bad!” He literally refuses to acknowledge that self-defense against an abuser does not make the victim an abuser too. Social Justice Llink Roundup.
Dr. Humphreys response to criticisms of Dr. Henke and Dr. Loechelt, Summary and links for the NonSequitur Show Story, I’m not atheist nor theist (Change my mind) Matt Dillahunty edition, Kyle Curtis: BUSTED editing PDF files he submitted to the court! And yet we can dismiss their concerns as antithetical to the creation of a just society without denying that they have a legitimate interest… because they are attempting to use their legitimate interest in an unjust and racist way. Any white guy who criticizes one single rape of a white woman by black males is going to be attacked for being a racist, even though large numbers of black men have, over the centuries, committed sexual assault and do need to be called out about it. Follow Us. Sarah: […] The person spreading these lies is a well-known drama queen and has no credibility left among anyone worthy of consideration. How do you post like this in good conscience? Now, I have no idea is the parents excluded clause is even real, and I am treating this as 100% hypothetical. You don’t get to deny your customer service because your religion doesn’t like the choices that your customer’s religion allows that customer to make. If the business operator is licensed and has signed a pledge not to discriminate on the basis of sex, then even if no trans* person ever showed up they might be breaking their professional licensure agreement. You very specifically say.
Jen points out that RR’s comparison of his wrist-slap to Galileo’s persecution is fucking ridiculous compared to everyday trans persecution. '"[28] He has also stated that he is willing to say "I don't know" in a debate, a "scary concept" to some of his audience. Nonetheless, shouldn’t you be honest about what you’re attempting to do? He first co-hosted The Atheist Experience in March 2005 and would go on to become a regular host of the program. He is 51 years old and is a Aries. But this is about directly addressing the first part of your question, “What would be your preferred outcome in this case?”, But your fuller question is, “What would be your preferred outcome in this case under your ideal laws?”, I might still change my mind upon learning more facts about this case, but say that all we know and all we will ever know is that, Sure. Given that, I can hardly be expected to offer an “equivalent” to this particular lawsuit, but we could start our efforts with this one: Overton v. Anheuser-Busch Co. 205 Mich. App. Maybe I’m just a little short of patience right now, but jess, can you please fuck right off? I’m not sure who PZ contacted, but no email was received by the board regarding this subject. This was a big deal. Ideally, they’ll contact me soon and we can make arrangements to transfer all of their blog content elsewhere. Sad developments.
I had hopes for you too, and you’ve more than lived up to them. He continued to harass me for a month, and even after I’ve blocked him, continues to spread anti-trans hitpieces. Your reply function sucks- two long replies have been lost. I’m sure once you single them out in blockquotes the world will see exactly how much of Thirdmill’s production has been unfairly ignored, returning the world to its ordinary state of justice once again. Seeing as every time I see someone use “white knighting” and I grill them on what the illigitimate defense of a person is, and that I’ve yet to get a description, I guess you’re not. How someone should go about attacking a claim, premise, conjecture, idea, hypothesis or theory. Among the defendants were a single mom and an immigrant working out of their homes, as well as a salon who employed a Muslim woman (whose religion forbids her to touch no one else but her husband).
You are right that I don’t think like other people though.
But hey, I’m just a transphobic bigot, so what do I know?
Reddit Comment: ddollarsign (Jul 25), [Re: Why did mods lock and hide a thread about FtB ejecting Axp?] You do not get to prescribe the labels I use. Labels: apologetics, Atheists, Cliff Knechtle, debate, Matt Dillahunty. (Sad that this blog collective upholds its stated ethos, you are, because talking the talk is enough for you but walking the walk is just a step too far), Video: Kevin Logan – John Iacoletti, Chelsea Rodriguez (1:35:20, Jul 28) You simply assert Agnosticism is middle ground- well, I can call a cat a dog, but I’m changing the language by doing so. It’s the Sam Harris/Jordan Peterson thing all over again.
[curbyrdogma, too late. “Transgendered” is not the past participle of that word, as adjectives don’t have past participles. I don’t want you to spend all your time yelling, “I can’t talk!” I want you to actually talk about the substance. Pogg. If you’re bringing up men getting sexually assaulted in order to change the subject from women getting sexually assaulted, I’m not going to be on your side in this situation.